Notifications
Notifications
CDW Logo

Cisco Triple-Rate Multiprotocol - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module - GigE, 2Gb Fibre Channel

Mfg # DS-SFP-FCGE-LW CDW # 2371962

Quick tech specs

  • Rate Multiprotocol
  • GigE
  • 1000Base-LX
  • up to 6.2 miles
  • for MDS 9120 Multilayer Fabric Switch
  • SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module
  • 2Gb Fibre Channel
  • LC single-mode
  • 1310 nm
  • 9140 Multilayer Fabric Switch; SN 5428
View All

Know your gear

Cisco MDS 9000 Family Fiber Channel Switching Modules deliver the intelligence and advanced features required to make multilayer storage area networks a reality. The Cisco Fiber Channel Switching Modules include hardware-enabled innovations designed to dramatically improve scalability, availability, security, and manageability of storage networks, resulting in increased utility and lower total cost of ownership (TCO). All Cisco Fiber Channel Switching Modules are hot-swappable and include hot-swappable, small form-factor pluggable (SFP), LC interfaces.

This item was discontinued on October 06, 2022

Enhance your purchase

Cisco Triple-Rate Multiprotocol - SFP (mini-GBIC) transceiver module - GigE is rated 4.70 out of 5 by 3.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from It's highly stable and well integrated What is our primary use case? We use UKG for payroll and other core HR functions. What is most valuable? I like UKG's integration. What needs improvement? UKG could be a little more flexible in some areas. For how long have I used the solution? I have used UKG for nine months. What do I think about the stability of the solution? UKG is highly stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I rate UKG eight out of 10 for scalability. How are customer service and support? I rate UKG support nine out of 10. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive How was the initial setup? Our deployment was complex, but that wasn't because of UKG. We weren't very structured when we implemented the solution, and UKG forced us to become more structured. The deployment took six months, and we had help from a third-party integrator. Five people from our company were involved. What other advice do I have? I rate UKG eight out of 10. We haven't had any problems with it so far. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-04-11T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A solution with the capability to integrate seamlessly with other third-party applications What is our primary use case? We use UKG as an HCM solution, which manages end-to-end HR-related work across the enterprise, like recruitment, talent acquisition, compensation, payroll, and everything involved in end-to-end HR-related activities. What is most valuable? UKG is capable of integrating with other third-party applications, making data flow quite seamless. The solution's UI is good. Also, it is very easy to use. What needs improvement? From my perspective, there are no significant downsides to UKG, as it is currently the leading solution in workforce management. Mostly, UKG is used in manufacturing industries. One area where UKG could improve is in its ability to understand its own competency and then work hard to improve it. In the future, I would like to see more applications integrated into UKG, as currently, it operates on SQL and Boomi platforms. It would be good if it could be an open-source platform. For how long have I used the solution? Our company deals with UKG's products. I have been familiar with UKG for two and a half years. Also, I use UKG's latest version. Our company is not using UKG but implementing the solution for other companies. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Stability-wise, I rate this solution an eight out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? I have dealt with more than 80 clients who use UKG. It is quite a scalable solution. Currently, if you need support in any of the modules, UKG comes as a complete or whole solution. Also, it can be the only solution to manage your whole HCM environment. Scalability-wise, I rate this solution an eight and a half out of ten. Also, I would like to add that I consider it closer to nine. How are customer service and support? UKG's technical support is helpful and responsive. I rate the solution's technical support an eight out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Positive Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? I'm working as a pre-sales lead on Workday's HCM platform. So, my company has three products under an umbrella. So apart from UKG, we also deal with Workday and Cornerstone. I work with all of them simultaneously. How was the initial setup? One can deploy the application on any cloud provider, such as Microsoft Azure, AWS, or any other cloud we want. However, in our organization, we always choose a private cloud as the data stored in the cloud is highly important. Our employees are valuable assets to our company, and we must ensure security and take care of the data that is very personal to our employees. The solution's implementation part takes approximately three months. As a pre-sales person, I may not have the technical expertise to provide a detailed explanation of the implementation steps involved. However, to the best of my knowledge, the first step would be to move the data used by the organization from its previous HCM applications to UKG. The second step would involve configuring UKG, which can be considered as the functional part. After that, we would focus on the integrations needed in the solution. Following that, we would conduct UAT, provide Hypercare support, and then the implementation would go live. It is quite easy to implement UKG, and one company can manage both implementation and AMS support. Therefore, one person can handle both areas. The number of personnel required for the solution's implementation depends on factors such as the number of tickets, user base, and the number of modules in use. If we consider an enterprise with 5,000 or more employees and they wish to support UKG as an application, they would need around five to six people for sure. What about the implementation team? There is a need to have a consultant or a third party to implement UKG. The person involved in UKG's implementation should be certified in UKG implementation to do the solution's implementation process without any problem. What was our ROI? By implementing UKG, an organization can enjoy a high return on investment as the product is stable. This stability can help lower the support costs required for the product. Additionally, the usability of UKG is pretty good, making the employees who are its end-users happy with the product. In short, the employees are quite satisfied with the solution. Basically, the solution not being very costly and being user-friendly are two noteworthy things. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? The licensing cost is yearly, but I am not sure about it. While I am unsure of the licensing cost itself, the total cost of implementation and licensing for a company with over 5000 employees would be around 6,00,000. So, there are additional costs beyond licensing. Considering the cost for everything from advisory to Hypercare, it would also come to around 6,00,000. What other advice do I have? I recommend others to use UKG. I recommend that those planning to use the solution ensure that the implementation and support partners are the same. This can lead to more stabilization of the application as a whole. Overall, I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Private Cloud Disclaimer: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Date published: 2023-03-20T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 by from User-friendly, good support, and stable What is our primary use case? We use UKG to monitor staff time management, specifically their clock-ins, and clock-outs. How has it helped my organization? We utilize UKG to track the time when an employee clocks in, takes breaks, and clocks out. This allows us to monitor the productive hours worked by the employee and how long they have been present. What is most valuable? The system is quite user-friendly. UKG allows us to customize our home screen so that we can easily monitor important items on a daily basis. It provides information on missing punches, and flagging instances where an employee takes a longer lunch or a short break. I believe these are valuable features of the system. What needs improvement? Currently, we have UKG integrated with another payroll system. I would like the capability to use UKG as a single platform without the need to alternate between systems. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using UKG for almost ten years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I give the stability of UKG a nine out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? UKG is scalable. How are customer service and support? Sometimes the system may experience glitches, causing it to run reports slower than usual. This is a normal occurrence. When such issues arise, we submit an IT ticket, and typically within fifteen to thirty minutes, someone will contact us to resolve the issue. What other advice do I have? I give UKG a nine out of ten. We have around 70 users at our facility. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Hybrid Cloud Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2023-04-23T00:00:00-04:00

This page was printed on 5/5/2024 4:48:22 AM.